sarcastass: (dull)
'Szelhamos' ([personal profile] sarcastass) wrote in [community profile] genessia2017-01-19 01:52 pm

voice

This is exactly why you don't trust scientists.

Don't get me wrong, I'm as fond of education and exploration as anyone else, but really this problem would have been solved before it even started if we just burned all of the offenders notes and maybe buried his research under a few tons of cement.

Drastic, maybe, but I find it'd probably be a great deal less damaging to the population at large that way.

It'd be just awful if there were to be a Guardian compromised by this.

Can you even imagine.

I hope we've all taken something very important from this, when someone suggests testing a hitherto unknown and possibly dangerous chemical substance on an unknowing populace, we don't just stop at firing them.

If they don't have the moral compass to not suggest using an entire city as a pack of guinea pigs, they probably don't have the moral compass to not do it anyway when you tell them no.

Have we learned nothing from fifties sci fi movies?
unhappy: (Do not have ears.)

text; anon

[personal profile] unhappy 2017-01-19 09:12 pm (UTC)(link)
[ She'd reply openly but she doesn't want to leave anyone clues as to where the hell she is. See, when people put a bounty on your head because they think you're dangerous even if you haven't done anything here it tends to be disconcerting when the next thing you see is something like this. ]

So your solution is to arrest people before they've done anything wrong just because you think they're a bad person?
unhappy: (They are not present in any shot.)

text; anon

[personal profile] unhappy 2017-01-20 04:43 am (UTC)(link)
Sorry, that was the optimistic version of what you implied with "don't just stop at firing them." Hard to be deaf or understanding about a cryptic statement like that.
unhappy: (Freaking bimbos.)

[personal profile] unhappy 2017-01-20 04:48 am (UTC)(link)
OK but if they already know how to do it then that's just kind of you being a dumbass and getting rid of the evidence for how to fix it.

I must really be off my game if I'm assuming you had half a brain that I wrote that off as what you meant.
unhappy: (His leg is broken not his ego.)

[personal profile] unhappy 2017-01-20 05:13 am (UTC)(link)
I think some fundamental part of you is just not comprehending what I'm saying since that's literally the first part that I pointed out, though I guessed you had some kind of plan to do something besides whine (my bad) and then you claimed it was just about getting rid of the evidence (which doesn't prevent him from doing it anyway if he has a memory longer than a goldfish).

IDK Maybe you should just accept that sometimes bad crap happens and "prevention" isn't always the solution. Or they could've got the guy help and reported the incident to get him on a terrorist watch list. Personally, I have to wonder why the water source is wide open for anyone to dump whatever they want in it anyway.

But really, any guy who feels the need to pull something like this clearly has more issues than just wanting to do science. I doubt his motivation was just 'it'd be cool,' so find out what the actual problem is. Or just kill him if you thought he wasn't going to stop no matter what you do, but that'd be on a more "caught him trying to dump" level.
unhappy: (but you know i'm cool.)

[personal profile] unhappy 2017-01-20 05:34 am (UTC)(link)
OK. let me break this down for you (please read this as if I'm speaking really slowly so you can keep up because just because you didn't mean something doesn't mean you didn't say it):

"...when someone suggests testing a hitherto unknown and possibly dangerous chemical substance on an unknowing populace" = didn't actually suggest that if you listen to the news report, that's just what he did after being denied a safe testing area because the co. didn't want to. Still not great but LOL come on man get your facts straight

"we don't just stop at firing them." = we need to do something after we fire them. Normal people would assume that this means actually doing something that would prevent them from taking action anyway. If this has been anyone other than some guy who is nuts enough to dump it into the water supply, you're basically assuming that anyone who believes something other than what you believe to be correct deserves a consequence for believing otherwise. Again, I assumed arrest because that tends to be what happens around here with the bounty-crazy population.

(It is a fact here, by the way, that no one actually cares if you're guilty of crimes, they set bounties for arrests anyway. How many times have people done bounties without even bother to check if the person was guilty? All you have to do is send one into the paper and put up the money. Aside the point, but gives context to the arrest assumption since that's how everyone around here seems to think. :) )

Now here's what I said:
"Or just kill him if you thought he wasn't going to stop no matter what you do, but that'd be on a more "caught him trying to dump" level."
If you caught a guy in the middle of dumping something into the water supply and you didn't know what it was or who he was but he clearly didn't belong there, would your solution be say "hey stop" and watch him do it anyway or to stop him? I didn't say hunt him down, I said that's only if you're right there and witnessing it happen and you can stop it.
unhappy: (Not actually sticky you perv.)

[personal profile] unhappy 2017-01-20 05:53 am (UTC)(link)
Congrats on being blind! Tell your device to read it slower. I believe in you.

I think I'm getting where this whole argument has you stupid if you thought any being with a brain would be dumb enough to ask to poison the water supply. If you're going to poison the water supply, you don't ask. My understanding is he probably asked Aster Tech- now stay with me here because common sense is complicated- to do a trial run on test subjects. When he got turned down, that's when he got angry and went to town with it.

I gave like a handful of solutions that would actually help and the only one you're focusing on is me saying that you can't stop crimes you had no way of knowing where going to happen. Especially if the ones planning them are smarter than you are. Captain Hindsight doesn't seem to be serving anyone at all either, but hey, you keep at it.

I've put bounties in for giggles before, but you're welcome to come try to find me. Hey, what's your name?


[ She loves how so many people can't figure out she's trolling. This is not the first time she's done this, anon or with her name, but lord she can't get enough of it. But at least it's keeping her out of trouble. Pretty much everything past the first question she's just been trying to harass him about. Though he's on it about the bounty, even if it's not in the paper. Just one of the affected deputies disliking her on a personal level. ]
unhappy: (A sly look.)

[personal profile] unhappy 2017-01-20 06:05 am (UTC)(link)
IDK you're the one who's been sticking with this for so long.

You either really like to argue or I'm not the stupid one.
unhappy: (Walk it off Mercury.)

[personal profile] unhappy 2017-01-20 06:41 am (UTC)(link)
Oh no!!! I've just learned that I'm stupid, whatever will I do...

This is it. It's over. I'm never commented on the internet again. You've cured me.

IDK IDK IDK IDK
unhappy: (Sticky fingered in the stealing sense.)

[personal profile] unhappy 2017-01-20 06:47 am (UTC)(link)
Believe me, the guy who owns the local bookstore will never forget my face.

[ RIP Tukson, you traitorous puma. ]
Edited 2017-01-20 06:47 (UTC)
hellish_butler: (One more thing)

[personal profile] hellish_butler 2017-01-20 02:13 pm (UTC)(link)
[There's a knock at Szel's bedroom.

Knock, knock.

Who's there?

Sebastian.

Sebastian who?

It's Sebastian checking on his housemate.

Yeah, let's come on in. The door open and Sebastian peeks in.]


You know, Mr. Szel. I do have a bottle of water straight from Nova City, containing the very same poison that affected the citizens there.

Do you care to try a sample to test your theory? After all, your post to the network that you posted last night is quite...scintillating, that I picked this up after work for you.

Or do you prefer the usual cup of tea for the afternoon?

[You see, Sebastian is being so...thoughtful and polite, he isn't really teasing him with the irony.]
Edited 2017-01-20 14:14 (UTC)
hellish_butler: (What do you want?)

[personal profile] hellish_butler 2017-01-20 03:12 pm (UTC)(link)
Both. Ah well, I'm only joking. I don't want to see you split into two half halves of your worse selves.

[The interior decoration is quite an improvement really. It feels cozy and comfortable like home.]

Optimistic are we? It would be more hard work for me to do, just to clean out the mess that is your rotten decayed purity. The vents needs to be in proper order to filter the clean air throughout the mansion, you know.

[With a bit of a hum, Sebastian presents afternoon tea, served on a china cup on a china saucer.]

Your afternoon tea, Mr. Szel. And don't make it more complicated by arguing with teenage deadbeats online. That will make your mind rot as well. Don't make it a poor habit. That can get addicting.

[But then again, isn't everyone bored?]
Edited 2017-01-20 15:14 (UTC)
shy_mage: (Confused)

[Video]

[personal profile] shy_mage 2017-01-22 01:35 am (UTC)(link)
S-Someone is... is poisoning people?

[A little slow on the uptake here. So asks the man living in the middle of the woods with his own personal water supply. Didn't help that the news tended to be something that he would 'get around' to reading and trying to figure out what was happening on the network would just confuse him. Somehow, this hadn't reached him...]
shy_mage: (Confused)

[Video - Not that it matters]

[personal profile] shy_mage 2017-01-22 01:41 am (UTC)(link)
Oooh...

[He was going to end up notorious for not checking things at this rate.

He shook his head. Which probably didn't really help Szel.]


N-No. I've just been in the f-forest. Is everyone... are they better now?

Page 1 of 4