maskgunraid: (Neutral/Frown)
Aaron Conner ([personal profile] maskgunraid) wrote in [community profile] genessia2018-11-29 10:58 pm

[Anon Text]

Guardian nominations, huh?

Huh, that's a weird way to start some sort of elections in Genessia. What are Guardians anyway?

Well, it doesn't matter. Because there's one thing I should know, I don't trust the people who will be nominated for it. And neither should you.
orlokbutterfly: ([Mask] Grin)

anon text;

[personal profile] orlokbutterfly 2018-11-29 03:29 pm (UTC)(link)
wow get a load of this edge lord. be careful not to cut yourself, kiddo.

if you bothered to read anything provided to you at the start, you'd know what guardians do. read a book.
orlokbutterfly: ([Mask] I came here to laugh at you!)

[personal profile] orlokbutterfly 2018-11-29 03:42 pm (UTC)(link)
holy shit, what are you, like, 12?

ohhh noooo! someone has ~*secrets*~! look at captain obvious over here with those world changing revelations!

guardians are a big reason why y'all aren't hobbling emotionless husks y'know. I'm just sayin.

(no subject)

[personal profile] orlokbutterfly - 2018-11-29 16:10 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] orlokbutterfly - 2018-11-29 16:23 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] orlokbutterfly - 2018-11-29 16:35 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] orlokbutterfly - 2018-11-30 00:53 (UTC) - Expand
innocent_royal: (Default)

anon text;

[personal profile] innocent_royal 2018-11-29 06:23 pm (UTC)(link)
I respectfully disagree.
innocent_royal: (Normal)

Re: anon text;

[personal profile] innocent_royal 2018-11-30 03:54 am (UTC)(link)
Because what if the Guardian nominee is someone you are related to, by blood or marriage? Or someone you knew all your life, or for as long as you have been in Genessia?
I don't deny there are sketchy people who will try to run, but insisting no one can be trusted is too cynical.

Re: anon text;

[personal profile] innocent_royal - 2018-11-30 04:07 (UTC) - Expand

anon text;

[personal profile] innocent_royal - 2018-11-30 04:17 (UTC) - Expand

Re: anon text;

[personal profile] innocent_royal - 2018-11-30 04:27 (UTC) - Expand

Re: anon text;

[personal profile] innocent_royal - 2018-11-30 04:39 (UTC) - Expand

Re: anon text;

[personal profile] innocent_royal - 2018-11-30 05:01 (UTC) - Expand

Re: anon text;

[personal profile] innocent_royal - 2018-11-30 09:37 (UTC) - Expand
trollkeru: (51)

anon text;

[personal profile] trollkeru 2018-11-29 06:49 pm (UTC)(link)
Trust them more than someone who says not to anon. Bit cowardly isn't it?
trollkeru: (33)

anon text;

[personal profile] trollkeru 2018-12-03 07:26 am (UTC)(link)
No more if people want justice some actually go out of their way publicly to make sure it happens while being public about who they are.

Also you'd be surprised at what the power of friendship can do.
priceofmagic: (well mannered smile for once)

[not anon]

[personal profile] priceofmagic 2018-11-30 01:31 am (UTC)(link)
The Guardian system exists to protect the population here, though not everyone needs the same kind of protections.

What about them don't you trust? Do you have bad experiences with law enforcement systems back home?
priceofmagic: (Default)

[not anon]

[personal profile] priceofmagic 2018-11-30 02:03 am (UTC)(link)
Something like that, yeah. I don't think Guardians need any special powers, but I'm sure it makes some people feel better? But for others, I'm sure it's scary.

That doesn't sound good. Arrest doesn't help if you aren't thinking about release.

What do you think the Guardians could do to "really" protect people? You don't need to immediately trust people, but I bet you could still give them great ideas.

(no subject)

[personal profile] priceofmagic - 2018-11-30 02:27 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] priceofmagic - 2018-11-30 03:16 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] priceofmagic - 2018-11-30 03:37 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] priceofmagic - 2018-11-30 04:24 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] priceofmagic - 2018-11-30 04:44 (UTC) - Expand
lazuline: (ninety)

Unanon

[personal profile] lazuline 2018-11-30 03:13 am (UTC)(link)
Hm. If you were seeking attention, it certainly seems you achieved it.

While there is truth in being careful with whom you trust, not trusting someone simply because they've chosen to run for guardianship only reflects upon you. If you have reason to cast doubt upon those who are running, you should share those reasons or perhaps consider the real reasons you feel so negatively toward these elections.

[she has chosen not to address the ridiculous "all celebrities should be investigated" nonsense she's seen elsewhere in this post.]
lazuline: (twentyseven)

[personal profile] lazuline 2018-11-30 03:38 am (UTC)(link)
It is in fact what you said, so perhaps you should choose your words more carefully. The text reads "I don't trust the people who will be nominated for it"

Understandably, it is a concern that power could corrupt someone who obtains it. I have seen it myself, in fact. However, it's best to give the benefit of the doubt to those who are seeking election unless we have reasons not to. Who wins will be up to those who choose to vote—there are some candidates I've seen that I would be more likely to trust in the position just by looking at how they've answered questions.

What would you propose instead, out of curiosity? Surely since you seem convinced that this is the wrong way about it, you have an alternative to present?

(no subject)

[personal profile] lazuline - 2018-11-30 04:04 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] lazuline - 2018-11-30 04:12 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] lazuline - 2018-11-30 04:18 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] lazuline - 2018-11-30 04:26 (UTC) - Expand
fashionably_strong: art by unknown, if this is yours let me know and I'll credit (yeah whatever)

[Unanon]

[personal profile] fashionably_strong 2018-11-30 03:42 am (UTC)(link)
Is that you stirring up drama again, Shigaraki?
fashionably_strong: (Default)

[Unanon]

[personal profile] fashionably_strong 2018-11-30 03:58 am (UTC)(link)
Some jerk with a victim complex who made a video post on the network showing himself attempting to murder a teenage girl a couple of weeks ago. He makes anonymous posts now and then and complains about society, but you know what? Reading over your texts to people, I actually believe you're not him.

[Mainly for a lack of complaining about heroes.]

[Unanon]

[personal profile] fashionably_strong - 2018-11-30 04:07 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] fashionably_strong - 2018-11-30 04:18 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] fashionably_strong - 2018-11-30 04:47 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] fashionably_strong - 2018-11-30 11:20 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] fashionably_strong - 2018-12-01 03:55 (UTC) - Expand
wonderland_vogue: (1)

[So unanon]

[personal profile] wonderland_vogue 2018-11-30 04:53 am (UTC)(link)
Or you can ask us questions if you're so inclined to distrust all of us. But maybe that's just my stance on the situation, I've been nothing but open with everyone here and there's nothing to hide as far as I'm concerned.

But broad generalizations like that doesn't really do anyone any good, now does it, darling?
wonderland_vogue: (Totally bored/that's shit)

Re: [So unanon]

[personal profile] wonderland_vogue 2018-11-30 05:54 am (UTC)(link)
Pft, criticism of what? You've given no reasoning here other than "oh, I don't trust them!" We need reasons for it to be criticism.

Re: [So unanon]

[personal profile] wonderland_vogue - 2018-11-30 06:14 (UTC) - Expand
justicereigns: (bored)

Text not-anon

[personal profile] justicereigns 2018-12-04 05:01 pm (UTC)(link)
Why not?

You don't even know what they do. They handle threats to the cities and try to keep it falling into the literal abyss. If you like existing, you can always try to find someone better for the job.